FallibleDragon ([info]fallibledragon) wrote,
@ 2006-10-03 22:13:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
This stuff with North Korea vs. World is looking bad.

On one hand, I (even as a proponent of non-violence) can totally understand why NK might want to have nukes right now, given that they're one of the last strongholds of a way of life (namely a form of communism), and that they're being pressured to conform by surrounding countries with totally different principles. That's enough to make any country desperate. Having nukes IS something that other countries are entitled to, so why not NK? Granted, NK isn't possessed of the most wise and noble leaders in the world, but then, the US is the only country to have actually used nukes in anger, so why can it have them, if NK can't have them to protect a way of life?

On the other hand, I think having a few basic nuclear weapons will not be the deterrent NK imagines it to be, and that they're probably going to provoke a pre-emptive attack instead. After all, it took nuclear subs etc. to discourage NATO and the USSR from going further. Does NK have nuclear subs already, and trident-like missile programs to make these few nukes a realistic threat? I think not.

I guess to my inexperienced mind, it seems what they're trying to do is just elevate their status enough to be seen as a modern power, that deserves equal respect. But, without a shitload of money to build modern armies and, more importantly, to influence economies and thereby line pockets of the rich and powerful, I fear they'll never get that respect. Which leaves them desperate. Sadly, our leaders aren't going to be wise enough to give them respect just because they're human and deserve it like the rest of us.

So... yeah, seems like bad news to me. Anyone seeing a more positive (or negative?!) side to this?


(Post a new comment)

riff
beginnermind
2006-10-04 05:25 am UTC (link)
I think that George Bush publically putting NK on a list with a bunch of other countries way back when, calling them the "axis of evil", and then attacking one of them, really makes a weak case for nuclear disarmament.

Life seems quite harsh in that country. Korea is a bunch of quite poor people cut off from the rest of the world and told there be dragons out there, the way I've been told. If that's true, the country could fall all by itself, if some other country with half a brain just smuggled in a few million more cell phones and video cassettes. Oh, and keep them from doing something stupid in the meantime. Which, colour me thick, seems to make threats from the leader of a nuclear superpower with incredibly advanced armaments and half the world's capital behind him contra-indicated. But what do I know.:)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: riff
[info]fallibledragon
2006-10-04 01:18 pm UTC (link)
Agreed on the axis of evil thing :/

I'm not sure I want NK to fall, though. Their communist regime isn't exactly nice, but then neither are most other regimes, including the US and UK regimes right now. Maybe if stop threatening them, they'll get the other stuff in order sooner. The principles of socialism (cooperation, from those who can produce to those in need) seem to be better principles than the selfish me-first approach of capitalism, to me. They have their own national events, like the olympic games, which are very beautiful, too. So in that much, they have an interesting, different culture, which is at least as valid as that of african tribes that most of us want to preserve.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

ingredients in tramadol tramadol dog
(Anonymous)
2008-02-19 11:05 am UTC (link)
picture of tramadol norvasc tramadol
ingredients in tramadol tramadol drug addiction tramadol kidney failure tramadol hydrocholride is tramadol hydrochloride water soluble tramadol ivtt tramadol dosage tramadol cheap easy tramadol effects drug reactions tramadol with tramadol

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…